## Here are parts of the new D.N.A./U.F.O-tables for anyone interested in it (vs Human Firmware!)

I could not be bothered to rewrite this section. But I have added anecdotes. I have a new mathematical, or conceptual equation about this listed below. Have that 108*116/2/2/2/2 is 783 (Schumann Resonance). 783/29 is 27. This might make the hours in a grid day which is 27 not 24. We would like to fit 10440 (!144) somehow. 10440/783*1.125=15..With this mathematics we may be imagining reducing 15 to 10: 10/1.125*783 is 6960. We might increase to 20 also. Note that 144 and 116 are so-called Harmonic.

And the corresponding Speed of light values of 1/696 is 0.0014367816091954023. It is not possible yet to create a bigger picture except for the data listed here, on all this. See the rest of this site.

We change 696 by 116 that 696/116 is 60 as in degrees of an equilateral triangle. 60*3 = 180. We would also then have 696/5.4352 (87/16=5.4352) is 128. 128 is 2*2*2*2*2*2*2. Somewhere is noted that the square root of 5 is a tangent of the Speed of Light.

Note:Someone have pointed me towards the fact that these listings match the Norwegian Hessdalen Phenomena.

We might also term all this "life code" if we want to.

All this is from the yzz() formula / function in the program that we have in design. with x (harmonic(x)) as 2.9, or further as 0.16 and 7.25 follows later. The equations simplified (n-1)/(2*a). Where a would be either 2.9, 0.16 or 7.25 etc. Note that the values listed in the tables here have an offset error of +1. I will correct the numbers when I find the time and effort to do so.

This is thus the "29" / "5" series up towards x=360. The common dividing for all of them is 5.8 (5.8/2=2.9).

N.B. Einstein Relativity formula 2b: (E=(4*(sqrt(2))/((1/c)*5/2))) shows results in parenthesis note that is requires answer/x*sqrt(2).

 x answer x answer x answer 29 5 (16) 174 30 (96) 319 55 (176) 58 10 (32) 203 35 (112) 348 60 (192) 87 15 (48) 232 40 (128) 116 20 (64) 261 45 (144) 145 25 (80) 290 50 (160)

It also has iterations of 29 and here is the so-called 2-series because it follows the 2 multiplication tables with x as 7.25:

Divisor here is 3.2 which would be 2*2*2*2*2/10.

 x answer x answer x answer 29 2 (6.4) 174 12 (38.4) 319 22 (70.4) 58 4 (12.8) 203 14 (44.8) 348 24 (76.8) 87 6 (19.2) 232 16 (51) 116 8 (25.6) 261 18 (57.6) 145 10 (32) 290 20 (64)

And now the last series from x=0.16 which is a bit different and will be listed different:

For some reason the relativity answer equals original x*10. We think this is the important series.

 1: 3.125 10.0 2: 6.25 20.0 3: 9.375 30 4: 12.5 40.0 5: 15.625 50.0 6: 18.75 60. 7: 21.875 70. 8: 25.0 80.0 9: 28.125 90. 10: 31.25 100.0 11: 34.375 110.0 12: 37.5 120. 13: 40.625 130.0 14: 43.75 140. 15: 46.875 150 16: 50.0 160.0 17: 53.125 170. 18: 56.25 180. 19: 59.375 190. 20: 62.5 200.0 21: 65.625 210. 22: 68.75 220.0 23: 71.875 230. 24: 75.0 240 25: 78.125 250. 26: 81.25 260.0 27: 84.375 270 28: 87.5 280.

Actually we might include some new listings of x=34/15 (2.2666666666..)

This one has recurrence 17 not 29 for some reason. And is evidently the 6-series for the E-expression.

 x output x output x output 17 3.75 (6) 85 18.75 (30) 153 33.75 (54) 34 7.5 (12) 102 22.5 (36) 170 37.5 (60) 51 11.25 (18) 119 26.25 (42) 187 41.25 (66) 68 15 (24) 136 30 (48) 204 45 (72)

Some last notes. Also from this table we get 306:67.5=108 a good number., 459:101.25=162 good, 442:97.5=156, 408:90=144, and 510:112.5=180, a few of these are geometrical values like 6*6*3=108 (lucky number in Buddhism at least, 6*6*4=144 (as in speed of light harmonic), 45*4=180 (as in degrees).

There are probably many of these UFO/DNA-tables as we have named them. Here are the equations that makes the various variables used now:

Actually there is no table here but all the digits are derived from natural expressions. For instance ((1/(n*5/2)+1/(n*2/5))/(1/(n*5/2))) give 7.25. The others also involved 2,3 and 5 and 1/x.

Just maybe a few of them is needed to give enough data to commence things or unlock the U.F.O. / D.N.A. / R.N.A./ Whatever.

It does not seem to fit with our own relativity equation (cos(x)*c+1/(1/c)**(3/2)) yet.

Main index.

(C)Krister Z-F. Lilleland.