Tables listing output from E**GAMMA..something about "alpha". etc.
e and Gamma:
e = 2.7182818284590464, Gamma = 0.5753641449035616.
Output: x,(e**Gamma)/2**x , 1/((e**Gamma)/2**x).
e**gamma = 1.7777..(reciprocal of 0.5625)
x:
2**x:
(e**gamma)/2**x
1/output:
1
2
0.8888888888888888
1.125
2
4
0.4444444444444444
2.25
3
8
0.2222222222222222
4.5
4
16
0.1111111111111111
9
5
32
0.05555555555555555
18
6
64
0.027777777777777776
36
7
128
0.013888888888888888
72
8
256
0.006944444444444444
144
9
512
0.003472222222222222
288
10
1024
0.001736111111111111
576
11
2048
0.0008680555555555555
1152
12
4096
0.00043402777777777775
2304
13
8192
0.00021701388888888888
4608
14
16384
0.00010850694444444444
9216
15
32768
...
18432
16
65536
...
36854
It goes to show that both e and Gamma (which are constants in physics/mathematics) combine
to give speed-of-light harmonics. With 1/((e**Gamma)/2**8) we have the normal speed-of-light
harmonic 144. The values used for the two constants e and Gamma are not exactly those of
physics-books but completely near them.
Actually we have taken Gamma from a log/ln function that normally is thought of as being to close
to it for comfort. And e is derived from e=(16/9)**(1/gamma) actually. With this, also (e**gamma)*s6
is 2. Would it then be possible to adjust say gamma and s6 to other values, gamma from another ln/log
function and maybe say s7?
Next up is tables without 2**x.
Alpha / Fine-Structure Constant (~1.37318) and acrobatics.
We just have 1.37318/x=2/1.125. From this one can get e**gamma (1/.5625) ~=1.777.. and also
with this 1/(144/alpha)*6³ -> 2.05977. Meaning unknown… Replace 144 with 72 -> 4.11954.
And 4.11654*.29 -> 1.1946666 .
IT is logical but need not be that maybe...
But it seems to regress into a Numerological Puzzle: 11*9*4*6*6*6*6 -> 513216 -> 5*13*216 -> 14040 -> /36 -> 390.
Same backwards from 360 -> .. --> 12960. Difference 14040-12960=1080. Difference up 15120...
1.14625??..14040 = ((225-2)*180)..and it goes on..and on..all to many fuzzy details..
Sorry this was a bit of a messy entry. This doesn't have to be "alpha" either maybe just a
haphazard and too optimistic coincidence in looking at the equations.
Things have it that we have to print the reciprocal to which is then 0.7282366477810629 which is what would be Alpha in true science sense.
Doing the same math as in the book: 137.318 * (phi*pi) = 698.0153646213469 (not at all near the value in Cathie's book but quite near 1/144).
(1/(((e**gamma))/2**9)) =~ 288, why?
No doubt the wolframalpha.com-cloud does more than compute for people? Doesn't it spy? If physics is really a spatial system does it try to build something? Would you try to do something
of that type? Do we think in terms of moon versus sun? The moon is the hardcoore than can be coded, the sun is energy and a virile force..
Here are some, very illogical:
7.25/7.2 == 1.0069444444444444(in-f) purpose of this unknown we can only guess about it
but we tried in trying if grid-space should be 7.5 or 7.25, the latter being derived
from a mathematical formula (at least) and as you can see this one is "equal" to
1/144 which is 0.0069444444444(in-f), obviously with out ONE..there seems to be some
sort of vauge sense in it.
But how or when this project will crystalice I do not know it, or about it.
We do not know either what impact FIBER OPTICS have on the electron-magnetix spectrum
of Earth as a Polar/Di-Polar entity. Does the light excite the magnetic field or what
does it do? Is it a short of defence are we now then in fiber and non-fiber areas?
...............................................................................................................................................
INDEX