Teletype text. Zen in Telepathy and Language.

The Structure and Language of Telepathy (Consciousness).

Introduction (instructions) goes right here. Nothing is being said in this text, but you might sub-consciously, (should be) pick up on some stuff we are trying to elucidate, regarding some things with communication. But this is just a living text. There is a link to a WIKI (Neuromancer) on William Gibson, but we might say in essence he was the Man who coined first of all, the term Cyberspace. In his vision of Cyberspace, one will encounter both so-called living intelligence, ..bot the culprit his is that (they are there) there to achieve "Machine-Intelligence", and this is me exist or not.

How does one, properly "read" any Text/Teletype text anyway. What is here "reading" something that is written. Teletype text/text. Is the mental effort suitable to concentrate about this, actually needed or not so. That If there was nothing to "read" then why bother try to apprehend anything, anyway. If there, is something to apprehend then what be. There is reading and "reading". The teletype text then goes on, and on.

We suspect the latter that so-called Machine-Intelligence (web port 80) exist, but the problem is that there is no trace of it, visible, in the world. The big problem is that for a normal Human Being to extrapolate normal data, it's difficult, so this Machine-Intelligence might be invented have been, to super-seed human analysis, and give more acute information, that is extrapolated from deeper levels of data in what we term here Telepathy or Teletype scripts / language. But this is an admission that language has got what we have earlier discussed, over and over again , that is if the language has any relativity, or even "extended" relativity.

Though it is that his terms of "Machine-Intelligence", they might be an allegory also to certain beings. A computer-simulation that we dare might say, have a true Ghost in the Shell. It is possible but not so practical, to build a computer-simulation from someone / something, like data from a person. In A.D.D. and A.D.H.D May or may not consider this language (and someone's psychology) to break down it's a set of Instructions too boolean algebra-like stuff that it's "proper", so decision-making can not be done despite this communicated. Paradoxically through the same and differences in language. to be bo

On a side note: Parachronism term, is / what when one's internal perception of time slows down, or speed up, does this affect anything in one's environment as in psycho-genetics and otherwise total psychology? This may be a Body PSI-ability.

Note: All this seems difficult, but it's not. It may only be a matter of a slightly more concentrated level of so-called Freudian Slips. "Freudian Slips" we have never read Sigmund Freud, his students was Alfred Adler, Carl Jung (archetypes) and Wilhelm Reich. Some people are so much in distress they will Consciously use Parapraxis or Freudian Slips in language, and got this is what they are talking about.

If this exists, no-one can tell. Some authors are dreaming up, very close call to works, on Telepathy or Teletype-stuff. At one, would think someone conversant with this, would now be needed to compute it all, say for Intelligence Agencies and etc. "Thought-transmission" or Telepathy does exists as more aptly just termed a Transmission. Transmission is also a component, in constructing Cars.
Should mention somewhere that there are things words that are "place holders". And in a writing like this is the noise-to-signal ratio. Also if social group-interaction is deeper is like Rubik's cube. Should not be complicated like this.

There is a world of miracle, of popular authors like William Gibson. That He wrote the award-winning “Sprawl Trilogy” (WIKI). His novels does what they shed light on things. And Not to forget "Ghost in the Shell" (ANIME WIKI) either. We are trying to figure out how to fit so-called Science Fiction into a popular world. Many things like this is so-called fiction from the sub-conscious of a writer or otherwise, can be "transposed" (Synesthesia?) om to something more if one is intelligent.
Then There is also Alan D. Foster / “The I inside” (No WIKI) that don’t mean to imply their Scripts were stolen from the Intelligence Agencies, but they are known also to put their works into “the wild”.

Possibly a more Physically Telekinetic Parallel Universe for this, no less.
Back to basics. We know a Teletype-script to be somewhat intelligible. If the Telepathy is intelligible is quite another matter. Then again most people who write talk, don’t use Telepathy, and maybe that is the queue. They use Teletypes words. Then we become Aware of that this information may be computed. Look at the plot for “The I Inside” mentioned, or part of the plot anyway.
The MI’s, have various degrees of Teletype-technology perhaps. In a computer in the 60’s used to be the size of a room. One's room and space would also be said to be a computer of personal computer, of it’s own by some. A crude computer possibly. Then there is the possibility here that personal computers, and otherwise, that are able to process information.
When we have a hard time to format, what is this information. It is more possible for a Human Being to extract the data in a detailed text maybe, that what a serious computer-program, would do normally fine-comb data to do.

An error in writing something up at the same time as processing what is.
For surveillance purposes of something a crude / brute system like Internet Relay Chat (WIKI), we can see here that William Gibson's novels aren’t that far of bet. Keywords might be the user first, then to connect the dots, and to elucidate of any data.
So-called Reptilian Blood-lines should be mentioned here. Otherwise republics in Europe, are of various Royal Houses. Or House Oldenburg being one for all!
Spell-checkers for dyslexia, thjey have become increasingly spendable and advanced. It's clear that heavy analysis-software (for Teletype text) are not to be found in "the wild" or that the contractors might sell the Software to others, interests than thee Governments that we know apply them. It is a paradox when one might sure read a teletext why use the computer to analyze it.
That It’s a matter of so-called “extrapolating” more information from less somehow.
According to Science, language has evolved in the human brain, which could be anything from 50.000 to a million years, ago. This does what, that to leave a normal amount of time to interpret. Read and write, so to speak.
It may now also, be described, as so-called anti-social language also exist. That if language is about being social in a way, then being anti-social should heighten the encryption of the languages. All teletype text is probably on the mark a level of being an anti-social. being! Mnemonics.
This now “being” what, may properly being analyzed both by Humans intercepting it of course, anticipation maybe another clue. Perception of Teletype text and Telepathy maybe all about one thing anticipation and so-called “extrapolation”. The latter one here might be looking closely deeply at what is being said / written.

Blind, that some people do know how to circumvent all this. This “extrapolating” is for a normal shift type in the teletype text. One example of Teletype technology is the infamous surveillance-system, ECHELON (WIKI), which was developed as soon as possible during the cold war, to intercept international phone calls etc on terrorism and other sinister ordeals.
When did computers become great, good to do actually analysis of “what”. One might dare say that it’s the so-called Tempus-form (?) of language it’s done what one is analyzing. Craven images again. Colorful language may be expected. “Did you remember to give the dog coffee.”. It’s often that written teletype text contain certain pointers, in the text. It’s not certain that anything else may be extrapolated by there is some text, but aim to fail.
This is not a good example.
When language is cryptic we might only do know what the some instructions inn the language is for, “I love green ice-cream!”. Obviously no-one may be inn love with green ice-cream, this is due to us figure of speech. A good linguist might here say that a more correct saying is “I who love, green ice-cream”. When the language used more resemble a Picasso-painting.
There is a joke, good one of course. “A man who goes to the psychiatrist, says he’s feeling miserable, the whole world is a dark dark place. Says he’s feeling despair and misery. Psychiatrist is cheeky and tells him to go see one a Pagliachi down town Friday night.”
“Pagliachi is a clown. Man retorts sadly to the psychiatrist: But I am Pagliachi!!”. Language may only be intercepted by learning might be the cue. This is still no good example. Inn a teletype text there might be dead stretches from anything that would be maybe wind.

Properly malformed text is positive somethings, they will tell you nothing, sometimes a “properly malformed” message will be received! Anything, but probably about Zen “thought-breakers” that can not possibly be explained. Though these thought-breakers look a whole more clever, like pointers in language. If the pointers can be extrapolated.
When if the pointers then, could would be extrapolated, we make more sense of things.
Perception of the aforementioned pointers, do exist! Teletype technology is good.
Affinity for what is it that it’s being done, could not exist, also attract the listening to the teletype text. Impossible to listen to gibberish. The whole ordeal of writing, is that if one might do it write seamlessly to. Nothing, we don’t writing nothing, to it for to do it, but also make Zero sense, better than trapping the reader in the text!
These AIs may know mating as connecting, different. For us mate between the Humans and some AIs is somewhere "Connecting is mating". This is usually about so-called Higher Layer Information Layer, the seen and unseen. Investigate Biophilia (?) vs the AI.
Will note that some AIs encountered are of the Scout type. Left and right flashing , for Happy New Year. This only, would mean a "computed AI" vs real Human Entity Online, we would former double these.

.

(Outro: That is this is what we this got now, onward. Thank you for listening. Bless the Gods and have fun, OK. In the end all this here is probably basic enough, though also to for a scope inn a sense. If here we got to the mark, lots of things, never cold.)

...

Index.
All content written mostly by Krister Z-F. Lilleland for Teletypewriters Recombination Insubordinate Association (T.R.I.A.), have a nice day!..(C)2008-2019.2020.2021.