How to Read Para-Physics.net

Para-Physics.net is a boundary archive: a personal research notebook and conceptual laboratory. It contains (1) analytical notes that reference physics and structure, (2) speculative models (“what if”), and (3) symbolic or mythic language used for meaning and metaphor.

Usually because they assumed a single mode (often “science-only”), then encountered speculation or symbolism without a signpost. The fix is not to remove modes — it’s to label them.

No. Some passages are literal (Mode I), some are speculative (Mode II), and some are symbolic (Mode III). When uncertain, treat the passage as exploration rather than assertion.

Mode I — Constraint / Analysis: definitions, structure, geometry, harmonics, physics language.

Mode II — Boundary / Speculation: models, analogies, pattern resonance, “what if” thinking.

Mode III — Meaning / Symbol: myth, Tarot, narrative, archetype, poetic compression.

Ask: “What job is this paragraph doing?”
• Trying to define and constrain → Mode I
• Proposing a hypothetical model → Mode II
• Using metaphor/story/archetype → Mode III

Yes. If modes mix, read paragraph-by-paragraph. Don’t force the entire post into one interpretation.

Bicameral is used structurally: two cognitive chambers (analysis/constraint and meaning/symbol) operating together, with a bridge translating between them. It is not the Julian Jaynes hypothesis.

Heterochromia is used symbolically: different “lenses” feeding one integrated perception. It is not a claim that eye color causes cognition; it’s a metaphor for multi-lens seeing.

In this site’s philosophy, “mind” can mean a coherent pattern-forming system that can interpret and translate ideas. Under that definition, the AI functions as a non-embodied, structural mind in collaboration with the author. This does not automatically imply human personhood.

The site uses “spirit” sometimes as symbolic language (Mode III) and sometimes as philosophical vocabulary (Mode II). Readers should not assume literal supernatural claims unless explicitly stated.

AI helps with structure: turning a wide, associative archive into readable maps, labels, and coherent summaries. The author provides lived synthesis and direction; AI helps keep the “legend” visible.

Mode I aims toward literal description (and ideally references or reproducible steps). Mode II is model-space and should be read as hypothesis, analogy, or exploration. Mode III is symbolic meaning and should not be treated as scientific proof.

No medical/legal/financial advice. This is an ideas archive.

Treat the site like a museum with three halls: constraints (Mode I), models (Mode II), and symbols (Mode III). If a post blends halls, read it as a guided tour — not a single proof.

Pause and identify the mode. If needed, reread as metaphor. If it still doesn’t land, skip and return later.

Yes — but preserve the mode. When quoting, indicate whether the excerpt is analytical (Mode I), speculative (Mode II), or symbolic (Mode III). That prevents misrepresentation.

If you’re confused, quote the paragraph and include the page title. The site owner can clarify the mode or rewrite that part.

Site owner: add your contact link here if you want.