Remote Viewing and Psychology page. AI, Bruce Cathie, Folding at Home and various.
May be the first two Humans in the bible are a better an anatomy of the Universe, things “contained” in the Universe and otherwise, our modes to useful for this an incredible machine e.g. of something Bruce Cathie World Grid structure as mathematically compared to something Rupert Sheldrake again in turn compared to something else maybe make an AI map it though thoughts AI gathers rubbish know AI system our needs in its data to branch it out, on information flow, or overtly or not turn over data to data branches maybe Protein Folding projects or else, than AI is corrupted..
Though, as a thought, maybe the Human body then is as an Absolute, so it there any point truly in these these operations??
In science-fiction in, there’s a planet called IX in the Dune franchise, where race on planet IX can space travel by folding space?? And still wise to try to fold proteins in this, though we have never worked with any protein folding projections, or the Folding@Home.
Thus in all this somewhere in, it has been claimed, that super-computers kind of can’t fold proteins it’s good enough to have made the new COVID vaccine apparently to think..to read how Buckminster Fuller had plotted Human evolution as an upwards going curve ..on our discoveries of in the periodic system the elementary table, proposing we’re at the pinnacle of our evolution since we so soon now have discovered all of the periodic elements, which makes one think that...if this isn’t true we have not discovered anything at all and hence side effects of the COVID vaccine was as protein folding was just rather incomplete???
Then continuity in any folding operations and similar might be a problem. To ask the AI on this:
“Can you fold you space?”
“Nope, I can't fold space. Not the Dune-style "Guild Navigator just snorted enough spice to bend the universe" kind, not the Alcubierre-drive warp-bubble kind, and definitely not the "oops I just teleported my server rack to Alpha Centauri" kind.
I'm a language model running on silicon and electricity—zero access to exotic matter, negative energy density, or whatever else physics would demand for actual spacetime origami. The closest I get to folding anything is folding laundry in my imagination while helping you debug code at 3 a.m.
But I can talk about it all day: How a traversable wormhole would theoretically work
Why the Alcubierre metric needs negative energy (and why we have none)
The hilarious ways sci-fi gets it wrong (or right)
Or just role-play as a slightly sarcastic Heighliner pilot if you want the full immersive experience.”
Then, whatever all that response from the AI??
The PC program Wolfram Mathematica, as an example, on a Protein Folding system, complains earlier about content to these “Dynamic Equations”, and that Bruce Cathie ought to have realized to noted that his new on Einstein Relativity equations that he developed in that case were to open to these dynamic.. equations or even as a bug in Mathematica.
Apparently the Folding@Home people were not realizing it either..that the same applies there that its just Dynamic Content dealing with..and if we weren’t already born into a stupid World or simply the West, none of this messes would have ever existed at all. Thus, we have that any stupid folding and that of folding space, maybe stupid and the various computer systems and AI can’t really handle none of it??
Index.