Summery of Einstein Comments. Physics Comments. etc.
Finally somehow the relativity Equation E=mc² all "convoluted" but still does mean that maybe the Hypothetical constituents of matter are negating each other, that light squared in terms of Energy-reactions what has a mathematical relation to it's reciprocal mass. Since mass is printed as a positive value while in relation to light it's really negative we might have this multiplication. Any mathematician might figure that, it all sounds very edgy but must be true if we are to have Physical reactions in say Chemistry. This is just empty speech though also there is an idea of "just matter". Actually the real-world Explanation here, does not make sense mathematically. And other non-sense theories "the unified absolute".
October 2020. That we, have written about Healing plus Yin and Yang and tried to make it equivalent with Einstein. That there is possibility of Energy in the Body, does Einstein have enough factors (equal to Yin/Yang) in E=mc² to warrant this? Since Einstein is said only to work on smaller scales (of Matter). However thinking of the Body as multiple layers of possible this Energy does help. There are possible Energy-flows not really existing when looking at pure Biology? This material writing like a Heretic, was not intended either. There should perhaps be some anti-dote in a manner (of speaking). Talking about something like all this is liable to make the target dote on it without any action. This in addition to the below there is a short text on viewing material like this. That there is a possibility that these writings are more Schizophrenia.
It now seems that m from E=mc² is supposed to when applied to Life-forms at least, to contain something "inside". This is a tour back to Newtonian Mechanics (and to remember that even though his thought was that the Earth was polarized like an apple) or was it Plato and Aristotle whatever, perhaps they knew something we no longer know or care about. It is a fallacy to think that we have not had brains all along through out history. It is politics and religion which clout (?) thinks not brains.
Far out overkill.→ Earth®:→ Reading Viking Prose Edda and other things one might believe that they were alluding to, or trying to explain the fact that the Earth started of as a blazing sphere of energy which manifested it self as the planet and ecosystem that we know today. Then we should not forget that behind everything in our bio-sphere is still that primordial energy-shape. As Einstein put it E=mc2, perhaps. At the same time as we are flesh bodies. Then from science we can conclude that we are also pure energy , like the primordial Earth we just were trying to describe, below our corporal molecular level. Here it also noted though that the Viking sage talk about Fire and Ice real which may be the Earth's hot core and freezing space?
We have that we know matter in reality is not static as we see it. One would look at a wood table's say "pattern" and it in this explanation will not move anything. Not the tapestry either. There is some divergence between all this, but question in relation to this was where are the, if Science is so great, film-cameras that allows us, to see, this stuff, that is to see it if not with our eyes then rather on some film-Camera's screen?
That yes there are artists which may paint this but we would suppose a logical camera-device to expected this. One article not our aim but state: ""Time is a vector of the magnetic spectrum and that spectrum has a place in itself for events... There is a pre-physical world in which the camera might be expected to operate" (Rexresearch.com) obviously we meant merely filming the molecular level say, of reality. And that one aspect of pre-physical aspect is.
It's all existing in parallel no? So why no film it? It appears some have got to invented a maybe tedious but workable solution (the-scientist.com). (And then obvious still this is not the "Molecular-machine" one may have had experienced in altered states. Hi. But. Described here earlier on but maybe defunct now.).
Missing Dark Matter may now also account for inverted/negated Space. See, below. Big Bang aside, some people ask why we exist. Well what else should have existed?
This that i.e the Moon exactly covering the Sun during an eclipse isn't just something to wonder about it's a pointer to something? We seem to be somewhere in the middle of, all, this but who will explain what about it. A certain cult would have it Existence is just a crazy co-incidence. But is that a "tender" interpretation? We should google this but will there be normal and elaborated answers. And some will say Moses said "Six days shall though labor and get all your work done, (and) on the seventh day shall though think." which is well worth noting reading our Rubbish.
Anyhow we have tried looking at some certain values / "natural constants" in the World-Grid section and it's been noted else where that Science does claim that certain what values had to be the way that they are else life as we know it, would could not exist. And of course the Moon being able to exactly eclipse occult the Sun are proof of things being good Geometrical. So if not Humans at least Nature is powerful.
Speculation: But what is the so-called quality of whatever our individuals existences, that are but aren't because mere existence is a reflection of the alternative, that not even nothing should (would) exist (that is there are no concepts for anything in this what dimensions, so nothing is not a description even), but our luck don't these two to go hand in hand perhaps, and that they are a responsible one an explanation (and Quantum Physics aside) to things that seem like Magic , Paranormal levitations i.e. and so on, the possible potential for good procreation in our every day lives, and also the "flax" is the web Norse Goddess Frig supposedly Weaves interconnecting all things etc. And not in Modern Nordic languages the words "Flaks" usually means luck / having good luck!
The Moon / Noom, does not "spin around the Earth" which has been demonstrated even in Science, it revolve together around a "Barycenter" which is albeit inside the Earth (but not the center), Like a Dance! For a new more Insight into possible the older or Earlier Civilizations on Earth, maybe, see the Game (for P.C / Linux / Android:) "Planar Conquest" / "Worlds of Magic" (steam),which are over-illustrated thick maybe but a good bet, also we tried the Original Game around 1994 (Master of Magic). Earlier Civilizations on Earth might have been just as evolved as ours (technology) been said but maybe build stuff then on different principles there are some famous so-called monuments today Pyramids noted no-one has yet bothered to classify them as some more Ancient /Earlier Civilization's something akin to actually some have proposed Pyramids have to do with ionic potential. What about this, if Egypt's Pyramids were to draw down anions /cations from the atmosphere for terraforming why is there dessert there now?
That is. If there were quite as advanced previous "technologically advanced" Civilizations on Earth aeons and aones and more time gone, what and why are they not here today? Or are they? What happened to them? Will the same happen to us if we don't become more confused conscious. And why are there only "theories" on ancient artifacts found what they are do, is it so impossible to us to try and comprehend these said previous Civilizations's technologies. Etc. New Note: Is not the answer to this exactly what is being tried described By Bruce Cathie. Additional Note: Nexus Magazine did printe one article of that some Pyramids excite Atmospheric Ion-potential perhaps acting as "ground" for this.
Tesla! There seems to confusion on what he supposedly said probably in his own semantics "The powers of 3,6,9", which true seems to be 3!, 6! and 9! which are: 6,720,362880. So hope that clears something up or not. I.e. powers are not to be more exponential in this particular case. So just a manner of Babel?
Science / Philosophy does not infinite speed in an infinite big medium or space create a sort of relativity? Light has no mass apparently so what one call a geodesic speed of light "harmonic 144000" in Vacuum should be equal to infinite speed, but if the medium, so it is infinitely big what does that say. Or is it a paradox? However sub-space should be very cold (or hot). Also if this acceleration beyond infinity is more a psychological things, or something a non-describable physical / quantum physical state or not. That is even if light is square maybe due it's reciprocal / inverted relation with mass (which is or is not the opposite of mass-less light/photons) there seems this notions too. Explanation of geodesic speed are in Bruce Cathie book.
Science has also proved (?) that sub-Zero Kelvin (nature.com) temperatures (which apparently are very hot) exists then one would like to think sub-Vacuum would exist too. Sub-vacuum (-1 geometrically) may not exist thought, thinking that since the speed of light is a product of this relativity it would not would have to travel at a speed faster infinite speed, in a sub-vacuum. That if Sub Zero Kelvins Temperature exist, we might consider other Sub-states like Sub-vacuum or Anti-vacuum where there would be an inverse relation to friction in respect to relativity and mass.
Geodesic speed of light is converted from normal miles harmonic 162 by dividing by (Synergetics constant S6?) 1.125 or 27/24 to get this is it "grid time". If there is zones in space with sub-Vacuum then light reaching such zones should accelerate beyond infinite speed because light would have negative values for mass, or it would simply be "attracted" to the next normal zone, like a drop in a pond of water. Sort of accelerated to the next "entry point" in Normal (0) space.Note: Part of this explanation is very. Bruce Cathie talk about "geodesic miles per second in grid-minutes or arc ..".
Absurd but light speed is said to be an absolute speed. The big whole of creation is also a giant "absolute"? So whatever , light speed is inside an absolute.
Did Einstein rediscover, on good grounds, the Taijitsu of Tao (out), even if news lately have for both denounced Einstein saying he had nothing do with the Atomic bomb other than having and Equation that measured it's magnitude. Einstein may have worked unaware or not of things generally sought unimportant if his discovery had any importance or not, not here as. Also see our new article on this.
Is the fine structure constant miss-leading? The formula on the pastebin-page (link near bottom of page) that give what looks like it. Without the normal input exchanged for 88 we get the output 15! (Though there could be some error in the program b/c we starting counting from 0 not 1 on a computer. This would mean 88 should be exchanged for 89 but 15 would still be the outcome.) Note 2021: 87 not 15 is equal. This relation was wrong. This relation would be 1376/29.
About "Inverted" spaceif it might exist. It implies a region of what we think of as "outer space" where there even space is negated. Thus in such a region, matter would become less relative, and speed of light travel would be possible, because of sort of negative friction say. Degrees below zero Kelvin which usually are thought to be the temperature in space, have been proved scientifically now so maybe that would apply to such a region "out there". Though scientists are trying to tell us that when they get degrees in their labs below zero kelvin, then the temperature suddenly "loops" into incredibly hot. Thus should we assume that the Sun actually also is far below Zero degrees kelvin, and thus explain it's existence that way?
INDEX.